Jeremy Freese Overcoming Objections to Open-Source Social Science Sociological Methods & Research 2007 36: 220-226.

February 7, 2010

Commentators appreciate the benefits of developing improved standards for replicating quantitative results in sociology. Nonetheless, reservations remain, and the author addresses several of them and explains why improved replication standards do not endanger participant confidentiality, do not undermine incentives for collecting data, do not need to wait for greater standardization of data formats, need not require that editors assign a reviewer to actually replicate results, and do not diminish methodological diversity in any positive sense. The author concludes by encouraging sociologists to find a way of moving beyond intermittent discussions of replication standards to collective action.

Key Words: replication • data sharing • data archiving • transparency


Replication Standards for Quantitative Social Science: Why Not Sociology?

February 7, 2010

Jeremy Freese Replication Standards for Quantitative Social Science: Why Not Sociology? Sociological Methods & Research 2007 36: 153-172. SMR 36:2 was a special issue on Replication and Data Analysis.

Jeremy FreeseThe credibility of quantitative social science benefits from policies that increase confidence that results reported by one researcher can be verified by others. Concerns about replicability have increased Read the rest of this entry »